International Comparative Study: Appraisal and Evaluation Practices of Science Capital Spending on Research Infrastructures

Final report

2018年8月30日，英国商业、能源和工业战略部（BEIS）发布《科研基础设施科学投资评价与评估实践的国际比较研究》报告，通过分析11个国家（爱尔兰、荷兰、比利时、美国、加拿大、德国、芬兰、瑞典、丹麦、挪威、澳大利亚等）的科研基础设施投资评估案例，比较了各国科研基础设施（RI）的科学资金管理、评估、监测体制机制。分析重点是中型和大型科研基础设施（投资超过100万欧元），对每个国家设施的关键专家进行了采访。

www.technopolis-group.com

International Comparisons: Science Capital Appraisal and Evaluation

Appendix E - Country Overview Compendium

更多

2018年8月30日，英国商业、能源和工业战略部（BEIS）发布《科研基础设施科学投资评价与评估实践的国际比较研究》报告，通过分析11个国家（爱尔兰、荷兰、比利时、美国、加拿大、德国、芬兰、瑞典、丹麦、挪威、澳大利亚等）的科研基础设施投资评估案例，比较了各国科研基础设施（RI）的科学资金管理、评估、监测体制机制。分析重点是中型和大型科研基础设施（投资超过100万欧元），对每个国家设施的关键专家进行了采访。

收起

www.technopolis-group.com

International Comparisons: Science Capital Appraisal and Evaluation

Appendix D - Case Study Compendium

更多

2018年8月30日，英国商业、能源和工业战略部（BEIS）发布《科研基础设施科学投资评价与评估实践的国际比较研究》报告，通过分析11个国家（爱尔兰、荷兰、比利时、美国、加拿大、德国、芬兰、瑞典、丹麦、挪威、澳大利亚等）的科研基础设施投资评估案例，比较了各国科研基础设施（RI）的科学资金管理、评估、监测体制机制。分析重点是中型和大型科研基础设施（投资超过100万欧元），对每个国家设施的关键专家进行了采访。

收起

本文介绍一种用于评估系统级系统（SoS）元架构选择的方法。

Conference on Systems Engineering Research (CSER’13)

Eds.: C.J.J. Paredis, C. Bishop, D. Bodner, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, March 19-22, 2013.

更多

A fuzzy evaluation method for system of systems meta-architectures

Louis Papea*, Kristin Giammarcob, John Colombic, Cihan Daglia, Nil Kilicay-Ergin d,

George Reboviche

aMissouri University of Science and Technoloy, Rolla, MO 65409-0370 USA

bNaval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA 93943 USA

cAir Force Institute of Technology, Dayton, OH 45433-7765 USA

dPenn State University, Malvern, PA 19355 USA

eMITRE, Bedford, MA 01730-1420 USA

Keywords: architecture, system of systems, fuzzy, evaluation

收起

本研究得到美国国防部系统工程研究中心（SERC）的资助，旨在找出系统工程关键文件——系统工程计划（SEP）、测试和评估精通计划（TEMP）和信息支持计划（ISP）三者共同的内容，以协调计划工作。

Abstract Submitted for the 13th Annual Systems Engineering Conference

Enhancing T&E and SE Alignment Using Database Driven Documentation

更多

The University of Alabama in Huntsville

Rotorcraft Systems Engineering and Simulations Center

Huntsville, AL 35899

Abstract – With complex system development, creating and maintaining documentation becomes

a multifaceted issue. Key Systems Engineering (SE) documents, such as the Systems

Engineering Plan (SEP), Test and Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP), Information Support Plan

(ISP) and other program related documents, require significant efforts to keep current, and

synchronized in an environment where change is constant. This results in the documents

becoming obsolete relative to fast moving development activities. Independent development of

these documents also causes inconsistencies between related information. These factors lead to

document misalignment and lack the potential benefits that could be gained from

synchronization between the systems engineering and testing efforts.

收起

Guidelines for

SME Access to Finance Market Assessments

(GAFMA)

更多

Helmut Kraemer-Eis

Frank Lang

Working Paper 2014/22

EIF – Research & Market Analysis

收起

Kurzexpertise

„Ökonomische Bewertung verschiedener

Vermögensteuerkonzepte“

更多

(Projekt-Nummer 012/17)

für das Bundesministerium für

Wirtschaft und Energie (BMWi),

Referat I C 4,

von Ernst & Young GmbH

Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft und

ifo Institut – Leibniz-Institut für

Wirtschaftsforschung an der

Universität München e. V.

20.11.2017

收起

Measuring the Information Society Report 2016

ITU

International Telecommunication Union